War on Words, part V
"Keep distant from false words -- מדבר שקר תרחק"
Let's stop using their fabricated terminologies that lend
credence to their fake narrative. I’ve addressed this disturbing phenomenon
years ago with regards to media bias [1],
but sadly failed to identify it for the past two years of intense
state/media/medical-establishment indoctrination. The words they use – and that
we subsequently adopt in casual speech – are subliminally affirming their
carefully-spun web of lies, deception, and incitement. Our language has been assaulted and hijacked. It's time to take back the narrative.
For example, every time we say "COVID," we
unwittingly acknowledge the existence of a "Corona Virus Disease,"
that this dreaded medical condition is actually caused by a corona virus.
Likewise, whenever we say "SARS CoV2," we
acknowledge that a novel “corona virus” causes a "severe acute respiratory
syndrome."
This claim is unsubstantiated and un-scientific, as no
empirical evidence exists that a so-called corona virus causes any disease or
syndrome altogether.
Instead, we might refer to the alleged pathogen of their
alleged pandemic (since "pandemic" is likewise an arbitrary claim
that is not corroborated by facts).
Actually, the notion that any "virus" is
pathogenic is just a theory, not a fact. The very existence of
"viruses" (by their definition) is unsubstantiated.
"Immunization" is likewise a myth, as no lasting
immunity is conferred by any vaccine. Speaking of which, "vaccine" is
a nebulous term that should be avoided as well, since it's confusing semantics
that dubiously equates this novel gene therapy with traditional
"vaccines" of the past.
Stop referring to people as “vaccinated” or “unvaccinated”
for the same reason. Moreover, the latter term is disparaging and suggests that
a person who wisely declined this dubious injection is somehow missing
something. Worst of all, these toxic terms are part of the establishment’s
dangerously divisive rhetoric that create apartheid divisions in our population
separating between the “have’s” and “have-not’s.”
Avoid the term "booster" as well. Where is the
science that this injection "boosts" anything? It's actually quite
the opposite: evidence suggests that it suppresses the immune system.
Stop calling it a PCR test. It doesn’t “test” anything and
was never intended to be diagnostic. It’s good for purely speculative genetic
research.
Please don’t say “safe social distancing.” Where is the
evidence that distancing makes anyone safe? If anything, it makes people less
safe and more vulnerable to loneliness, hunger, apathy, and tyranny.
And the most absurd term of all is "Public Health
Policy" LOL. Since when did any of their policies make anyone healthy? If
anything, these policies have sickened the public, causing autoimmunity, injury,
paralysis, sterility, and death. “Public Unhealth” is more accurate.
It's high time we avoid their agenda-driven, deliberately misleading terminology and insist on semantic accuracy.
In summary, here are the dubious terms to avoid:
