Friday, February 19, 2021

Do Individuals Matter in "Public Health Policy?'

 


"Public health policy" was never about health of any individual.

It was always about the so-called "public."

The individual child who occasionally dies from a vaccine is simply par for the course.

It was a necessary sacrifice for the sake of the public, or so the party line goes.

And who is to determine what is good for public health?

Not you, me, or any other individual. Not even any individual physician or scientist.

Only experts who are endorsed by the public, since it's only the public that matters here.

But who gets to speak for the public?

Only three entities are so entitled. They are:

  1. Government (which supposedly is democratically elected, but in actuality is funded by special-interest corporate investors and donors)
  2. Medical mainstream (funded by the same special-interest corporate investors and donors)
  3. Mainstream media (monopolized by the same special-interest mega-corporations)

Any individual who dares question the public's narrative is censored and silenced by Big Tech, which is similarly entitled to speak for the public, as part of Mainstream Media.

In Public Health Policy, the individual is of zero significance, and even worse.

The individual poses a serious risk to the well-being of the public.

Individual rights, speech, opinion, choice, and even access to facts, all need to be curtailed in order to maintain the public's safety.

Of course, it's ultimately all about what's allegedly good for the individual too, since, as the thinking goes, the individual only matters as part of the public.

Subjecting the individual to the risk of an experimental gene therapy without informed consent is supposedly acceptable even if it results in his premature death, since his life was only meaningful in service of the 'public.'

He died for a noble and worthwhile cause, since it was 'for the public.'

This rationale has far-reaching consequences that you probably never imagined.

For example, suppose the three exclusive authorities of public welfare -- or the entities that fund them -- were to determine that there are too many individual humans alive in any given state or continent(s), and that the 'perilously'-large population jeopardizes the fate of the 'public.'

Suppose the 'public' decided that it's worthwhile to expose individuals worldwide to life-threatening toxins in effort to mitigate the population, thereby protecting the 'public' from the uncertainty of 'over-population' risks.

Suppose the only way to accomplish this was by engineering a dreaded pandemic and subjecting the entire population to lockdowns and isolation -- first voluntarily, just for 14 days to "flatten the curve," but ultimately by coercion -- in order to reduce the population of individuals to desperation, hopelessness, and total dependency, dependency on those three arbiters of 'public,' i.e. government, medical establishment and its pharmaceutical products, and media.

Individuals are declared public health risks, forced to wear masks and keep their distances from other individuals, in a manner of "divide and conquer."

Houses of worship are declared non-essential and shut-down. School is deemed an unnecessary privilege that can be shut down by the slightest whim. This is important since religion and education promotes individuality, and that is non-conducive for public welfare.

And then, the 'public' releases an experimental injection that is geared to providing temporary relief from the current alleged pathogen, but in fact serves to prime the unsuspecting population for far-deadlier consequences in the future.

The masses of disposable faceless individuals line up to take this experimental product in spite of its unknown risks. They are desperate to 'return to normal' at all costs after suffering a year of traumatic abuse. The dangling carrot works wonders and a world population of individuals obsequiously get injected.

And then, some time down the road, a massive population reduction is achieved when hundreds of millions -- or even billions -- of individuals die off, thereby saving the 'public' from the fate of overpopulation. 

The plan would be for the unsuspecting population of surviving individuals to never realize that they had been poisoned by Public Health Policy, but instead be convinced that it was from a subsequent 'naturally-occurring' pandemic for which they had been secretly primed. However, even if the truth were to leak out, it could be easily justified by the very principles of public health policy. It was an altruistic act to maintain public wellbeing. Surely all those individuals who died (or suffered lifelong injury) did so for a just cause. It was all for the good of the public.

Does this scenario sound conspiratorial to you? Too dystopian for your preferences?

If you accept the basic premise of the 'morality' behind public health policy, then you already have condoned it. Your belief system has already deemed this imaginable.

By very definition, "public health policy" is an assault on individual health, individual rights, and individual lives.

Not just the handful of children who die each year from vaccines, whose deaths and life-long injuries are brushed under the carpet for the sake of 'public health.' Not just the thousands of people who have died from the experimental covid injection so far, whose deaths are hailed as a necessary sacrifice to 'return to normal.'

Public health policy is an assault on every single individual alive on earth today, each and every one of us.

We are all fair game, since our individual life, wellbeing, essential human rights, free choice, etc., have all been deemed to be secondary to 'public health.'

If the individual doesn't matter, then none of us matter.

If you believe in humanity, if you care about the fate of humanity... you must oppose the twisted morality of public health policy.

The individual is sacrosanct, independent from the so-called public.

The individual has infinite value.

Individual rights are untouchable.

Friday, February 12, 2021

Doctors and the Covid Injection

Many are asking:

Should I take the covid injection since so many doctors are recommending it? What if my rofeh yedid* recommends it?

Answer:

There are matters concerning which the Rebbe never said to consult with a rofeh yedid. CT scans during pregnancy is an example. He simply said not to do it, under any circumstances, irrespective of what any doctor says.

Likewise, the Rebbe never said to consult a rofeh yedid about whether one should vaccinate.

Instead, he stipulated that one should take only it if its safety is tried and proven, its safety record is well-established, manufactured by companies with reputations of being incontrovertibly saafe and reliable. We already discussed how none of these conditions apply with regard to the current experimental covid injection.

Consequently, your rofeh yedid has absolutely no authority in this matter, nor does any other doctor, or not even a majority of the world’s doctors. Their view is halachically irrelevant in this discussion. It would be foolhardy and irresponsible to listen to them.

In fact, it’s quite the contrary. Numerous expert doctors have come out against this experimental pharmaceutical product. They warn about the risks of pathogenic priming, and maintain that it carries significant known and unknown risks that include lifelong injury and death.

Shulchan Aruch Harav, Orach Chaim siman 618:5, states categorically that if there are two physicians who caution against fasting and raise concerns that it could cause serious risk to the patient, even if a hundred other doctors insist that it’s safe for the patient to fast, and even if these hundred have superior credentials, the law is that it is forbidden for him to fast, because with regards to uncertainty involving life and death, a stringent ruling is not determined by greater wisdom or greater numbers. Instead, the two who caution that the patient should NOT fast serve as expert testimony, and two witnesses are considered equivalent to a hundred by Scriptural decree.

Halacha requires us to err on the side of caution.

Nearly every time the Rebbe spoke about territorial integrity of Eretz Yisroel, he invoked Shulchan Aruch Orach Chaim siman 329:6, and the laws of pikuach nefesh.

Likewise in our current dilemma, we must stay true and consistent with the Rebbe’s approach.

Shulchan Aruch Orach Chaim siman 618 clearly precludes this injection.

It is categorically prohibited by Jewish law, and that is the end of the discussion.

It doesn’t matter if a preponderance of rabbis still endorses this ill-advised product. It was exactly the same thing with regards to land for peace. Nearly all rabbis supported this foolhardy move due to overwhelming societal, government and media pressure, but that did not change the Rebbe’s stance one iota.

For decades, he stood up as a lone voice maintaining the truth. He was once asked: “But what about the majority of rabbonim who support land for peace?”

The Rebbe replied that Rabbi Yosef Karo only published his Code of Jewish Law after getting the agreement of all the leading rabbanim of the generation, and that the Shulchan Aruch has been universally embraced by all Klal Yisroel. As such, his unequivocal psak din represents the majority view for all Jews of all times. So in fact, the Rebbe’s insistence for shleimus ha’aretz DOES represent the majority view of Klal Yisroel by very definition.

It’s exactly the same here in our current discussion.

By adhering to the Rebbe’s bold example and to the timeless ruling of Shulchan Aruch, we shall surely succeed in safeguarding the health of our families and communities.

אין לנו אלא דברי בן עמרם.

The truth will prevail, since אמת מארץ תצמח. Truth will sprout from the earth, and tzemach is the name of Moshiach... because by boldly and unambiguously asserting the truth, we shall proceed directly to the true and complete geulah, through Moshiach Tzidkeinu, in the most immediate present!

Tuesday, February 9, 2021

Israel's Obsession with the Covid Injection



Why has the State of Israel become the first government to aggressively enforce an experimental injection while subjecting its population to extraordinarily draconian shutdowns?

Why is it poised to become the first state to introduce "Green Passport" that effectively marginalizes the unvaccinated and bans them from the public?

Why are they the first country to use its army to vaccinate its population? First to use ‘divide and conquer’ method in attempt to get everyone vaccinated?

Why was it one of the first countries to close its borders, close its schools, and close itself entirely, crippling its economy, effectively making people desperate to "return to normal," even if that means taking an experimental injection with countless known and unknown risks?

Why has Israel become the first country on earth to militarize its health care? And why is this state so fanatically obsessed with becoming the first "fully-vaccinated country" on earth? And why does it already have the highest vaccination per capita in the world -- 1 out of every 3 people!?

In my opinion, the answer to all these questions is deeply disturbing. I do not write these words flippantly or lightly. Yes, it is rather eschatological.

As I’ve elaborated on in the past [1], covid policy is too eerily-familiar to ignore. It smacks of Nazi-era ‘public health concerns’ as a pretext for tyranny and human rights abuses. 

The fact that this is occurring worldwide suggests a global agenda to impose tyranny and control over the world population. It seems that injecting humans everywhere with the so-called covid vaccine is a crucial part of this apparent agenda.

However, aggressive government efforts to subject a population to an experimental injection – one that carries risk of lifelong injury and infertility, not to mention death – invokes the Doctors’ trial and Nazi atrocities against European Jewry. How will they get away with that? Won't the masses protest?

Perhaps that’s precisely why Israel was to be the first to implement these unprecedented efforts, so as to cast off suspicion of genocide on a world-scale, or perhaps the right word is “humanicide.”

No one would ever suspect the so-called Jewish State – whose very existence was supposedly justified by the collective Jewish victimhood of the European Holocaust – of victimizing its own Jewish population with Mengele-style atrocities!

Jews don’t commit genocide against Jews, or so the thinking goes. A “Jewish” government and Jewish doctors can’t possibly be antisemitic, can they? Who would ever suspect Jews of poisoning Jews? No, they must be acting out of benevolence and authentic concern for their fellow coreligionists’ health, right? And their “righteous zeal” to aggressively ‘vaccinate’ their own can then serve as a precedent and model for the rest of the world, who will eagerly mimic Israel’s “exemplary” concern for the “public health” of its own.

Don’t fall for it. It’s the same old story. Nuremburg Code isn’t suspended when it’s Jew against Jew.

In fact, it’s all been foretold by the Prophets that in the end of days Jews will wage war against Jews. [2]

We are witnessing cataclysmic prophecies coming to fruition. However, we who are armed with the truth must fight back to defend our people under assault. We must expose the lies and the evils of these crimes against humanity. We must work tirelessly to save as many souls as we can by educating one individual at a time.

There is no time to waste. Too many innocent lives hang in the balance.

We are teetering on the precipice of moral degeneracy beyond which there is no return. When informed consent no longer matters, we have lost our soul.

We must save the soul of humanity.

Let's start by saving the soul of Israel


Notes:

[1] Here are some of my past articles addressing it:

http://westbororabbi.blogspot.com/2020/12/covid-vaccine-and-final-solution.html

http://westbororabbi.blogspot.com/2020/11/deja-vu.html

http://westbororabbi.blogspot.com/2020/11/marxism-and-mandatory-vaccination.html

http://westbororabbi.blogspot.com/2020/10/rock-from-dachau.html

http://westbororabbi.blogspot.com/2020/10/war-on-humanity.html

http://westbororabbi.blogspot.com/2020/09/biggest-lie-of-our-era.html


[2] Zechariah 14:14. Rashi ibid that they will be forced to wage this war against fellow Jews.


Monday, February 1, 2021

Hast thou Murdered and Inherited!?

A perfectly healthy man just took the covid jab. Shortly thereafter, he developed severe symptoms and died.

It was cynically reported as a "covid death."

This reminds me of a recent tragedy in our community. A woman, who had been suffering from anorexia for many years, was in critical condition due to her perilously low body weight. Her family (dear friends of mine) called to notify her doctor, who grimly replied that due to covid, she would NOT be admitted to the local hospital, since the spaces were reserved for covid patients only. Instead, the doctor advised her family to try to hydrate her with drops of sugar water.The family called 911 but were told the same thing by the operator. In desperation, they reached out to me. I called several nurses I know, but none were able to help.

The woman died in her home due to dehydration and malnutrition shortly thereafter. 

Her life could have been saved by a simple IV, but she was condemned to die by covid policy.

Shockingly, the family was dismayed to learn that her demise was dubbed a covid death, and that's how it was recorded on her death certificate.

Of course, this utter fabrication was good for covid policy, since it boosted the number of covid mortalities. It presumably benefitted the doctor's office, hospital, and state too, since generous funding was awarded per every "covid death."

My friends, do you grasp the enormity of the falsehood being propagated here?

This woman did NOT die from covid, yet her untimely death is being exploited to benefit that same criminal covid policy that actually caused her untimely death.

Same with regards to the man mentioned above. His demise was construed as a covid death when in fact he was killed by an experimental injection whose emergency use authorization is justified by covid deaths like "his." Truly revolting.

There is a Biblical precedent. King Ahab allowed his wicked queen Jezebel to arrange for his cousin Navot to be falsely accused of a serious crime by royal henchmen and executed in court, so that he'd inherit Navot's vineyard he had so coveted.

Shortly thereafter, Elijah the Prophet appeared before Ahab in Samaria with an ominous admonition:

So said the Lord, "הֲרָצַחְתָּ וְגַם־יָרָשְׁתָּ -- Hast thou murdered and also inherited?" [1]

Public health policy is guilty of the same. Have you murdered and also inherited!? You ruthlessly condemned my friend's mother to her death, and hundreds of others to untimely deaths due to your experimental and risky injection, and then you impudently claim their deaths as "covid mortalities" to justify your depraved deeds!

"In a place where there are no men," I have no option to remain silent. As a modern-day spokesperson for my ancestor Elijah, I must gravely inform you of the subsequent verses:

And Ahab said to Elijah, "Have you found me, my enemy?" 

And he said, "I have found you because you have sold yourself to do what is bad in the eyes of the Lord. I will bring disaster upon you and I will expunge after you..." [2]

Indeed, you and all your collaborators -- so-called "public health policy" ideologues and those enforce it -- have sold yourself to do what is bad in the eyes of G-d.

There is nothing worse than complicity to evil for personal gain:

But there was none like Ahab who had sold himself to do bad in the eyes of the Lord, that Jezebel his wife instigated him. [3]

This is the sorry state of our contemporary "health care," which might more appropriately be called "death care" instead.

I refer here to not to health care workers themselves, but to policy makers.

To health care workers, I beseech you: do not heed unjust orders or implement lethal covid policies.

"I was merely following orders" was not a valid excuse at the Nuremburg Trials and it won't stand up to scrutiny in the Heavenly court either.

"Righteousness, righteousness you shall pursue." [4]
"Do what is right in G-d's eyes." [5]
"Stand not over thy brother's blood." [6]

Save lives and promote life. Protect your patients and cause them no harm.

G-d is watching your actions and your decisions.

Choose wisely.

Choose life. [7]


Notes:

[1] Kings I 21:19

[2] Ibid verse 20-21.

[3] Ibid verse 25.

[4] Deuteronomy 16:20

[5] Exodus 15:26

[6] Leviticus 19:16

[7] Deuteronomy 30:19