Thursday, May 21, 2020

Kidush Hashem in Brooklyn!


 
"The learned in a dark, frigid cellar...
Alone, just a small group of kids...
when in came policemen, and led them all away
the flame of Torah flickered on that day." 

Sad song, isn't it?
No, I wasn't referring to the Communist Russia of the 1920s.

I was talking about Brooklyn, NY in the 2020s.

Antisemite De Blasio gloats over his recent bust of an 'illegal' yeshiva operating in Williamsburg in which seventy Jewish children were learning Torah.

He tweeted: "“Earlier today the NYPD shut down a Yeshiva conducting classes with as many as 70 children. I can’t stress how dangerous this is for our young people. We’re issuing a Cease and Desist Order and will make sure we keep our communities and our kids safe.”

[Parenthetically, the Communists shut down yeshivos in the name of keeping communities safe too. "We can't stress enough how dangerous group Torah learning is for our young people," they said.]

Oddly, the coronavirus poses negligible risk for young people, so it's unclear what De Blasio was even talking about, but let's leave that aside for now.

Jews throughout NY shake their head in shame, bemoaning the situation: "Oy, what a chilul Hashem" is heard throughout Brooklyn.

Let's dissect that: 

Who made the "chilul Hashem?"

Those Jews who reopened a cheder to teach Torah to children as we are obliged to do by our holy Torah? As our ancestors risked their lives to do in Stalinist Russia and throughout our history?

No,those Jews did NOT make a chilul Hashem.
Instead, they made a kidush Hashem.

Halevai everyone would follow suit. The city and its antisemite mayor would invariably back down.

The ones who are guilty of making a chilul Hashem are the obsequious Jewish communities whose chadorim, yeshivos, and shuls are still closed in deference to anti-Torah state policy.

The ones who are guilty of making a chilul Hashem are the Jews who are shaking their heads ashamed of the Jews who boldly opened that 'illegal' cheder.

If you are accusing those Jews who opened the cheder of causing a "chilul Hashem," then YOU are the chillul Hashem, sadly.

Become a kidush Hashem by reopening your schools, yeshivos, and shuls, without fear or cowardice.

Show your Gaon Yaakov.

Speaking of 70 children and gaon "Yaakov," our patriarch Yaakov descended to Egyptian Exile with 70 souls, with newborn Yocheved being mashlim the minyan. These 70 souls were empowered to resist the pressure and influence to succumb to the hostile 70 nations.

Yasher Koach to those brave Yidden in Brooklyn who reopened their cheder for those precious 70 young Jewish souls. A promising sign in these dark times of Golus America. [1]


Let's finish the song:
 

"Someday we'll learn Torah together...
Someday we'll be brave and go to shul...
Never will we have to express any fear...
Our shame and our angst will disappear...
Avrohom and Yitzchok, will be so proud of us
Kedoshim of the past will watch us and kvel...
Competent rabbis will lead us once again...
in New York City, b'ezras Hashem!" 

And may we go to Yerushalayim and build the Beis Hamikdash NOW.


Notes:
[1] Speaking of 70, this year 5780 is the seventieth year of the Lubavitcher Rebbe's leadership. If only the Rebbe's own chasidim in Crown Heights could muster up the courage and moral fortitude to teach Torah to their children with the same conviction as those bold yidden in Williamsburg.

Public Challenge to All Rabbis


Dear Rabbis:

There is much ignorance about the so-called mandatory vaccine schedule vis-a-vis halacha. Let me be very clear: halacha does NOT endorse the current mandatory schedule in any way. As of this writing, there is not a single authoritative posek who has endorsed it in writing.
Banning a Jewish child from talmud Torah simply because s/he is non-compliant with this halachically-unjust state policy is a grave violation of Jewish Law. It is a given that halacha upholds every parent's right to religious exemption to the schedule.

For some strange reason, some rabbonim seem indifferent or oblivious to this fact and continue to allow the vaccine schedule to be abusively enforced in their communities. At present, or at least up until the recent corona outbreak, thousands of Jewish children were NOT permitted to attend talmud Torah in countless kehilos throughout the US.

If such is the case in your community, I challenge you to a public dialogue (or debate, if necessary). Furthermore, for the benefit of the tzibur and for these hapless children, I am willing to discuss (or debate) this urgent topic with any orthodox rabbi(s) of any community in the US, or with any serious Torah scholar for that matter.

Let me just forewarn you that I have corresponded with the gedolei haposkim on this topic and come well-prepared.

If you are open-minded and intellectually-honest, I will gladly present you with objectively-coherent halachic argument against mandatory vaccination. Needless to say, I am quite confident that your position will change significantly.

If you wish, our meeting can be just the two of us, without fanfare or publicity, so that you won't feel the defensive need to save face and be perceived as winning an argument. I'd urge you to consider the actual halachic sources with an open mind, and not as an exercise in polemics.

Please do not ignore my challenge. Surely this dire matter (i.e. bitul Torah of tinokos shel beis rabban) deserves your time and attention. I cannot think of anything more pressing.

I welcome your reply.

Respectfully yours,
Rabbi Michoel Green
Westborough, MA

Public Challenge to Alan Dershowitz




5/21/20

Dear Attorney Dershowitz:

There is a recent video interview circulating in which you argued that the state has the right to literally seize you and "plunge a needle in your arm" to "protect public health." You also insist that Judaism doesn't defend one's right to decline a vaccine.

You espoused this extreme position last year too during the measles outbreak. You may recall that you had made a public challenge to any rabbi who'd be willing to debate you on the topic of mandatory vaccine policy vis-à-vis Jewish law. At that time, I accepted your challenge and sent you a message (below). You never responded to me.

For the sake of truth, I hereby publicize my acceptance of your challenge. Here is my letter to you last year:

6/19/19

Dear Attorney Dershowitz,

Peace and blessings.

You wrote: "I challenge any rabbi to debate me on the Jewish religious law regarding vaccination and communicable diseases."

As a musmach of Rav Pinchas Hirschsprung with twenty-five years in the rabbinate, I happily accept your challenge.
Judaism arguably recognizes the benefit of vaccination at least with regards to specific disease, vaccines, locations, and time periods. However, Judaic Law is squarely opposed to mandatory vaccination and to the shocking elimination of religious exemption in New York State. Halacha acknowledges the parent's (or any adult individual's) right to choose.

As a scholar of Jewish religious law, I welcome the opportunity to discuss and/or debate this topic with you face to face. I'm right here in Massachusetts, so it shouldn't be hard to arrange a meeting. If you are open-minded and intellectually-honest, I will gladly present you with objectively "coherent religious argument against mandatory vaccination." Needless to say, I am quite confident that your position will change significantly.

If you wish, our meeting can be just the two of us, without fanfare or publicity, so that neither you nor I feel the defensive need to save face and be perceived as winning an argument. I'm happy to engage in public dialogue as well. I'd urge you to consider the actual halachic sources with an open mind, and not as an exercise in polemics.

I welcome your reply.

Respectfully yours,
Rabbi Michoel Green
Westborough, MA

Wednesday, May 20, 2020

Who's the Authority?


Just read the most puzzling statement from the Beis Din of Crown Heights [1]:


'First of all, all restrictions from legal and medical authorities obviously must be adhered to.'

This odd designation is repeated again several paragraphs later: 'At this stage, the Badatz defers all such decisions to the local medical and legal authorities.'

Who are the "legal authorities?" Does he mean their antisemite mayor De Blasio or Governor Cuomo? The NYPD? Or does he mean the Dept. of Health?

Since when does a rabbi exhort his adherents to adhere to all restriction and decisions of "legal authorities" with regards to davening, attending minyan, Torah studies of tinokos shel beis rabban? Not only that, he writes "obviously," as if this extraordinary statement is a given.

And who are the "medical authorities?" The CDC? WHO? Dept of Health?

Surely he knows that there are plenty of medical experts who disagreed with the entire social-distancing policy to begin with. So it seems he refers to just those specific medical experts who were 'authorized' by the government as "medical authorities."

Since when is there such a concept as a "medical authority" in Jewish law, beyond one's own doctor, who doesn't necessarily wield any "authority" to speak of? [2]

So do "legal authorities' and "medical authorities" both refer to government? Does he mean that there is one authority but it's both "legal" and "medical?"

This sounds rather authoritarian and un-Jewish if you ask me.

Is this rabbi abusing his rabbinic authority? Or his he neglecting his rabbinic duties by not adjuring his kehila to acknowledge a higher Authority?

Even stranger is the odd contradiction of items two and three:


2. We have been advised that the former restriction against people from the street attending the so-called 'porch minyanim' is no longer a necessity, provided proper social distancing, etc., is maintained.

3. The Badatz... does not consider itself an authority on medical matters. (The original need for the Badatz to intervene was to prevent the mistaken notion that Tefila B'tzibur or other similar halachic requirements supersede concerns of Pikuach Nefesh.).

Wait a minute... the "legal and medical authorities" never banned porch minyanim. The Beis Din did. In fact, the Beis Din had prohibited everyone from engaging in tefila b'tzibur, not just "people from the street" but even people on their porches who had never left their properties.

Does the Beis Din take no responsibility for fanatically enforcing an authoritarian policy well beyond the actual requirements of these so-called authorities?

Hmm...I don't live in that neighborhood and unfortunately have not been able to communicate with those rabbis since I questioned their abuse of authority last year when 500 healthy children were permanently banned from their neighborhood schools by their own instruction.[3] And in that case too, when questioned, the rabbi cited deference to "authorities" and took no responsibility. Hence my visceral reaction when I just read it in this most recent letter.

So again, I am compelled to wonder: who are these rabbis' 'authorities' and to whom do their loyalties lie? Although I have no way to ask them directly, I humbly recommend Crown Heights residents to clarify these bizarre remarks with the rabbis who wrote them.


Notes:
[1] Dated 24 Iyar 5780, i.e. yesterday, Monday, May 18th. Image of letter below.
[2] With regards to a patient with a diagnosed condition, a doctor can wield authority in the realm of healing, v'rapo yerape, but not necessarily in the realm of precaution, as the renowned Rabbi Chaim Brisker once commented.
[3] And 10,000 Jewish children were banned from school in their entire state, without a single word of protest from this Beis Din, or any other for that matter! Shomu shomayim. Umsaymim b'tov.

Tuesday, May 19, 2020

Letter to Rabbis Worldwide

"Social-distancing" minyan in Williamsburg

Dear Rabbis of Jewish Communities worldwide:

The Torah studies of Jewish children, the congregating of Jews to pray and study, and the functioning of shuls and yeshivos, are essential to our faith and to the very existence of our people. See sources below [1].

Needless to say, Judaism does not take closing shuls and yeshivos lightly.

As such, we, the undersigned, demand an explanation.

For the past two months, rabbis imposed and enforced an extraordinary worldwide ban of yeshivos, schools, synagogues, houses of study, and even tefila b'tzibur on separate porches.

Such drastic rabbinic action is unprecedented in Jewish history and surely requires a written psak din that provides sources, rationale, and precedent in halacha. This psak needs to be able to stand up to peer review of other rabbanim of our generation. Moreover, it requires signatures from an authoritative posek or rav moreh hora'ah b'poel.

We understood the delay of such a psak in its first few days of the local outbreak, when such extraordinary measures were undoubtedly a knee-jerk reaction in response to horrific reports of a novel disease that was purported to be highly contagious and was anticipated to cause widespread cataclysmic mortality in our communities.

However, many weeks have elapsed since then and still not a single authoritative written psak din taking responsibility for these rabbinic bans.

Furthermore, this virus has not proven to be nearly as deadly as anticipated. Even in New York with the highest COVID-19 death toll in the world, it cannot be defined as a plague (dever) according to Jewish law. Even in the beginning, it was known to pose negligible risk to children and young adults. Even for adults in their thirties, forties, and fifties, the risk factor is not nearly numerically-significant enough to justify a total ban on tefila b'tzibur or limud haTorah with tinokos shel beis rabban.

Some rabbis pointed to statistical risk to an entire population, and argued that observing the social-distancing policy with stated objective of "flattening the curve" is a moral imperative. However, they made no effort to prove that statistical risk has any bearing in halacha.

Some cited the halacha that during an outbreak of a contagious disease, even if the mortality rate of a plague is not reached, parents still have an obligation to evacuate their young from the city to protect them from mortal risk [2]. That would certainly make the case for individuals who are at significant risk for dying from COVID-19 to isolate, but in no way does it justify removing children, young adults, or anyone else who isn't at serious risk, from the public.

To compound our astonishment, the rabbis who enacted these sweeping bans on public prayer and Torah study made no effort to exhort their adherents and community members from waiting in lines at liquor stores, candy stores, or any stores for that matter, nor did they call upon their local Jewish store owners to close their stores to the public. They failed to prohibit members of their kehila from taking walks in the park, jogging, or engaging in any other public activity.

The reason they didn't is rather obvious. These rabbinic actions were not about actual pikuach nefesh but about endorsing a preventative public health policy that has been adopted by the medical mainstream and the government.[3]

Halacha mandates that pikuach nefesh is docheh kol haTorah kula only when there is an actual sakana for the person himself or for his fellow [4]. This is not only the viewpoint of the Torah, but l'havdil the medical establishment understands that as well. And this is precisely why the government and World Health Organization haven't outlawed picnics at the park or shopping at ice cream stores, since these activities aren't actually killing anyone or directly endangering any specific person's life in actuality. Instead, the government's order to shelter in place is a policy (adopted by many countries -- but not by ALL countries) with stated objective to slow down the spread of the virus by limiting certain activities that it deems non-essential. Even though it was known that the disease would ultimately infect a vast majority of the population notwithstanding social-distancing, the intent was to strategically keep daily number of patients at a manageable level for medical providers.


Whether or not this policy is wise is not the point of our objection. "Flattening the curve" may well be a laudable and worthy objective. We object to the government's deeming the essentials of Judaism as "non-essential." This determination is no less than an egregious assault on religion!
We are astounded that many rabbis have not only agreed to parrot the government's policy of banning organized religion, but have gone wildly "beyond the letter of the law" by prohibiting outdoor minyanim even for ten Jews who have already contracted and recovered from the disease! And even if they respect "social-distancing laws," and even in Jewish neighborhoods that have already achieved herd immunity according to medical experts! 
As praiseworthy as it may seem, the policy of "flattening the curve" does not account for sufficient halachic grounds to shut down yeshivos, chadorim, shuls or study halls, and it certainly never justified banning tefila b'tzibur.
Even worse, it threatens to demoralize our people and recklessly put us all at risk by removing the very foundation of our existence.[5] It also establishes a dangerous precedent that the government may decide at whim to ban public worship or study, shut down yeshivos, and interfere with the most inviolable tenets of our religion, with nary a rabbinic protest.
We demand a proper psak din in writing from an authoritative posek taking responsibility for these extraordinarily bizarre and unprecedented policies once and for all. Short of that, we demand an immediate re-opening of all yeshivos, chadorim, shuls, in Jewish communities everywhere.
Sincerely,
Rabbi Michoel Green

Notes:

[1] Some sources:
The entire purpose of the creation of man is that Hashem’s presence should dwell in the world - and this is accomplished through Jews gathering (for Torah study and the performance of mitzvos) - ten Jews specifically! Tanya (Igeres Hakodesh epistle 23). See also Avos 3:6, Berachos 21b.
Ahaz reasoned: "... If there are no houses of prayer or study, G-d no longer causes His presence to dwell in the world." What did he do?  He rose and locked up all synagogues and houses of study, so that Jews can no longer occupy themselves in Torah study...
Why was his name "Ahaz?" It is because he seized (and locked up) the synagogues and houses of study... There had never been a time that was as severe for Israel as then, as it states: "And I shall hide My face on that day on account of all the evil that he did..."
Psichta to Esther Raba 11
Yerushalayim was destroyed only because the studies of tinokos shel beis rabban were interrupted, as it is stated: ...pour (the wrath) onto the babes outside (Yirmiyahu 6:11)... What is the reason that the wrath is poured? It is because the “babes were outside” (of their schools)...
The world only exists because of the breath of tinokos shel beis rabban (reciting Torah).
Shabbos 119b
[2] Shulchan Aruch Orach Chayim 576:5 Ramo and Magen Avrohom s'if kotton 3.
[3] There has already been a disturbing precedent of rabbis' silence or approval of halachically-dubious "public health" policies. Last year, 10,000 healthy children were banned from schools and yeshivos because of non-compliance with the mandatory vaccine schedule which no authoritative posek had ever endorsed or even allowed, and which leading halachic medical expert Rabbi Dr Avraham Steinberg has deemed unneccary and unjust. Likewise, no recognized authority on halacha ever sanctioned the ousting of these Jewish children from talmud Torah, yet some rabbis embraced this bizarre policy in the name of public health. Shockingly, these children were not permitted to return to school even after the measles outbreak was declared over. Surely such unprecedented and extraordinary actions required a detailed written psak taking responsibility for banning healthy children from talmud Torah, but alas no such psak was ever provided.
[4] See Shu"t Tzitz Eliezer 17:2. 
[5] See Berachos 61b.

[6] Mere statements from certain rabbis (several of which were never even signed!) are insufficient. Regarding Rabbi Asher Weiss's pamphlet on Corona: #1 he is not an accepted posek in mainstream, and #2 he did not provide any halachic rationale for shutting down schools and shuls. This is reminiscent of when he was cited as the posek who approved of policy that bans children from school because they weren't vaccinated for hepatitis-B, for example, but he had never written any such thing.


Clarification

A bit of clarification concerning the previous post:

1. The letter was written by my brother, Rabbi Daniel Green, a resident of Crown Heights. Yes, we bear resemblance, but don't let the photo fool you. I am NOT the author.

2. Yes, I agree with the sentiments expressed, although I might have articulated them a bit differently. My own position on this matter has remain unchanged since the beginning of the outbreak. Yes, I agree that the rabbis of that neighborhood (and of many kehilos elsewhere) made a grave error, and need to correct it, and the sooner the better.

3. No, rabbonim are NOT inerrant or infallible. They are human and capable of making a mistake. No, we may NOT obey or defend a faulty psak din, nor may we ascribe it any authority. Yes, we must hold them responsible when serious mistakes happen, as they did for the past two months. In fact, this error began over a year ago when these same rabbis enforced unjust public health policies and betrayed 10,000 innocent Jewish children, as I have protested extensively in previous posts.*

4. Kovod haTorah is always important, but the kovod of the Torah learning of a hundred-thousand Jewish children (or more, כן ירבו) is far more important. No personal disrespect was implied to any one particular rabbi. This was not about personalities or natzchonus, but about standing up for tinokos shel beis rabban and for the very kiyum of klal yisroel.

5. My brother is NOT responsible for making any one rabbi look bad. If anyone "looks bad," it's because the individual had discredited himself with his own actions. My brother merely stated the truth. Sometimes the truth hurts, but it must be stated nonetheless. Hasha'ah tzricha l'kach.

6. Yes, my brother's letter has been effective. In the past 24 hours since it was posted, he has received an outpouring of support from community scholars, rabbis, and chasidim. The rabbi who has been primarily responsible for these rabbinic abuses has already retracted his position and agreed to no longer enforce medical policies of any kind. Boruch Hashem.

7. Yes, the letter was necessary in asserting the truth in Crown Heights. Its message was reviewed and approved by rabbis competent in Jewish law.


* Examples:
https://westbororabbi.blogspot.com/2019/08/open-letter-to-chabad-rabbis.html
https://westbororabbi.blogspot.com/2019/09/open-letter-to-chabad-chassidim.html
https://westbororabbi.blogspot.com/2019/08/open-letter-to-errant-rabbis.html
https://westbororabbi.blogspot.com/2020/01/exposing-lies-part-ii.html
https://westbororabbi.blogspot.com/2020/01/dont-misrepresent-rebbes-words.html
https://westbororabbi.blogspot.com/2020/02/be-rebbes-voice.html
And many more letters.

Monday, May 18, 2020

Open Letter from Rabbi Daniel Green to Crown Heights Rabbis


Guest contributor: Rabbi Daniel Green (bio below)

Open letter to all rabbonim of Crown Heights, sheyichyu:

Never before in history has such darkness befallen the world, rachmana litzlan. I need not elaborate or belabor this point, but let it suffice to say that the congregating of Jews to pray and study, the functioning of shuls and yeshivas, is essential to our faith, and to the very existence of our people and the universe: 
The entire purpose of the creation of man is that Hashem’s presence should dwell in the world - and this is accomplished through Jews gathering (for Torah study and the performance of mitzvos) - ten Jews specifically! 
Tanya (Igeres Hakodesh epistle 23)
Ahaz reasoned: "... If there are no houses of prayer or study, G-d no longer causes His presence to dwell in the world."
What did he do? He rose and locked up all synagogues and houses of study, so that Jews can no longer occupy themselves in Torah study...
Why was his name "Ahaz?" It is because he seized (and locked up) the synagogues and houses of study...
There had never been a time that was as severe for Israel as then, as it states: "And I shall hide My face on that day on account of all the evil that he did..."
Psichta to Esther Raba 11
The world only exists because of the breath of tinokos shel beis rabban (reciting Torah).
Shabbos 119b
Yerushalayim was destroyed only because the studies of tinokois shel beis rabban there were interrupted, as it is stated: "...pour (the wrath) onto the babes outside" [1]... What is the reason that the wrath is poured? It is because the “babes were outside” (of their schools).
Ibid
In light of the above, with a heavy heart and woeful consternation I write this letter of protest. Several months ago you banned tefila bitzibur and limud hatorah b’asarah, essentials of our faith. Your ban pre-empted the government’s bans, and you stood by in silence and support while community agencies closed all our yeshivos and chadorim. 

You did so by asserting that pikuach nefesh is “docheh kol hatorah kula.” Community members readily complied with your ban, due to the fear of themselves contacting the disease, and more importantly, to save the elderly and immunocompromised, an altruistic attempt to observe the mitzva of “lo saamod al dam reyacha.”

After months of “sheltering in place” with total shutdown of all mosdos chinuch, shuls and minyanim, etc, I am compelled to object to your assumptions and erroneous application of the notion that what you refer to as pikuach nefesh is grounds to stop not only Jewish observances like biur chometz and tevilas keilim, but to do away with the aforementioned, crucial tenets of Yiddishkeit as well; namely, Jews gathering in prayer and Torah study.

Had your order to shelter in place been an edict of pikuach nefesh in order to save lives as you claimed, then why did you not ban us from visiting and waiting on lines at neighborhood stores? Why did you even allow these Jewish-owned businesses to remain open? Why didn’t you ban members of our kehila from having picnics or strolling in Prospect Park?

Do not claim that as religious leaders, your jurisdiction is limited to shuls and yeshivas, or that you couldn’t prohibit that which the government had allowed. That is a sorrowful and specious excuse. If your concern is pikuach nefesh, then you were surely obliged to prohibit all the above as well. How could you have relied upon the government's laxity in these areas when Jewish lives are at stake?

Furthermore, why did you not close the women’s mikvah? Surely ritual immersion at this time is not an activity for which women should be risking their lives or the lives of others to execute, and abstinence, in such life-threatening situations, is compulsory.

In addition, how were the wine stores allowed to remain open, when the need to recite kiddush and havdala surely doesn’t override a tangible threat of sakanas nifoshois!

And moreover, why did you not asser visits to the Ohel, which clearly involve the verboten and “grossly-irresponsible” act of congregating, since groups of ten people are allowed into the Ohel at a time? In fact, while the Beis Din refused to allow any minyan in Crown Heights, a prominent member of the Beis Din was seen visiting the Ohel two Fridays ago!

The inconsistency is glaring. You have banned all minyanim, closed all shuls and yeshivos - effectively preventing the shechina from being manifest in the world (as sourced at the opening of this letter) - clearly considering them as non-essentials, yet standing with a quorum of people in the Ohel was for some reason exempt from the ban!

(Incidentally, later on the very same Friday, the same rabbi forbade a man [who had a chiuv to recite kaddish for his mother] from joining an outdoor minyan in a large, enclosed parking lot of an apartment building, where each of the participants of the minyan took meticulous precaution to respect social-distancing guidelines).

My point in publicizing your inconsistencies is not to suggest that you close the wine stores, or the Ohel, or mikva’os, chas visholom.

My point is quite the contrary.

Halacha mandates that pikuach nefesh is docheh kol hatorah kula when there is a tangible and acute sakana for the person himself, or for one’s fellow (see Shu”t Tzitz Eliezer siman 17 perek 2). This is not only the viewpoint of the Torah, but, l’havdil, the modern world’s medical establishment as well.

And this is why the government and the world health organization have not stopped people from picnicking at Prospect Park, or buying ice cream, liquor, or other non-essential delicacies. Because the said activities are not “killing” anyone, and people have a right to their liberty and pleasure-seeking lifestyles, as long as they are not directly endangering the lives of themselves or others, which they surely are not. The government’s order to shelter in place, then, is a policy - a policy adopted by many countries [but not all] with the stated objective of “flattening the curve,” i.e. to strategically keep the daily numbers of disease cases at a manageable level for medical providers. A state, by limiting the exposure of its citizens to spending most of their time sheltering in place, and keeping their interaction and getting together to a minimum, attempts to slow down the spread of the virus.

To this end, the government has chosen to limit certain activities and allow others, by deeming them essential, in order to curb the numbers and statistically minimize the said exposure, as mentioned.

Whether or not this policy is valid is not the point of my letter of objection. Flattening the curve may very well be a laudable and worthy objective. I object, however, to the government’s deeming the essentials of Judasim as non-essentials to the lives of Americans. These judgements are no less than an attack on religion!

I object to not only the decrees of the government, but sadly, to your stance, as the rabbonim of Crown Heights, who not only agree to the government’s policy of banning organized religion, but wildly going “beyond the letter of the law” by prohibiting outdoor minyanim even for ten Jews who have already contacted and recovered from the disease! And even if they respect “social-distancing” laws, wear masks and stand at a six-feet distance! And even now, when Crown Heights has already achieved “herd immunity” from the virus according to most medical experts!

However humane and praiseworthy it may seem, the policy of flattening the curve does not account for sufficient Halachic grounds to shut down yeshivos and stop all Jews from praying with a quorum, G-d forbid. You have provided no evidence to prove otherwise, for there are simply no Halachic sources to support your outlandish position.

Alas, since the government’s “flattening the curve” policy, with the rabbonim’s approval, has prioritized and defined essentials and non-essentials of all Americans, and has unfairly rendered Jewish prayer and study as non-essential and hence legally forbidden, the said guidelines fall under the category of governmental decrees against faith!

Lubavitch behind the Iron Curtain has a long history of standing up against such decrees even while the rest of the world sat idly by. When the Soviet dictatorship closed all private schools, religious and otherwise, and shut down all houses of worship, Jewish or otherwise, they never officially targeted the Jewish People. As such, there was no religious obligation to disobey its edicts, for one could practice Judaism in his own home - with the government’s blessings. The Frierdiker Rebbe’s mesiras nefesh, as it were, was not indicated halachically, as per Shulchan Aruch (Yoreh Deah siman 157). Nevertheless, with tremendous determination and selfless devotion, he worked tirelessly to keep underground schools open, since “hasha’ah tzricha l’kach” (Ibid, the Rama in s’if alef) - he needed to keep Judaism alive. Neither government policies nor “health concerns” could stop Lubavitch’s insistence on keeping yeshivos open. When a typhus outbreak spread like wildfire across Russia, and took the lives of many of the members of the Jewish community, Tomchei Tmimim remained open.

While you, esteemed rabbonim, apparently feel that the yeshivas and shuls being open is a threat to human life, Judasim feels otherwise. Tefila bitzibur and limud hatorah, b’asara davka, is in fact the raison d'être for the world’s existence, and will only increase our lives and lengthen our days - ki heim chayeinu v’orech yameinu!

As such, I respectfully voice my objection to the reckless and indefensible decrees made by you, the religious leaders of our community. I object to your ongoing silence as the government targets our faith, restricts that which is essential to the kiyum of our people, and in fact has recklessly endangered our lives and the lives of all our coreligionists [2], by crushing our spirit and demoralizing our communities, brazenly closing our houses of worship and study, the conduit for G-d’s presence in this world.

We need our yeshivos, chadorim, mesivtas, and shuls opened.

Now.

Hasha’ah tzricha l’kach.

With hope for an immediate change, and a complete and immediate recovery to all coronavirus patients,

Sincerely,

Rabbi Daniel Green,
a resident of Crown Heights

[SEE NOTE BELOW ABOUT COMMENTS]

Notes:
[1] Yirmiyahu 6:11.
[2] Can it be that the unprecedented shutdown of tefila b’tzibur, limud haTorah of tinokos shel beis rabban, etc., explain the uncanny and disproportionate number of casualties, r”l, in New York state, home to most of the nation’s shuls and yeshivas? Hashem yiracheim. We surely need the merit of these essentials to our faith now more than ever.



About the author:
Rabbi Daniel Green is an educator, author, and scholar of Judaic Law. He resides with his family in the Crown Heights neighborhood of Brooklyn, NY. 


IMPORTANT NOTE:
All comments are subject to moderation, as I do not allow spam or other undesirable filth that is sadly prevalent on Crown Heights tabloid sites. All anonymous comments are deleted, as are comments that contain ad hominem or name-calling to any particular rabbi or person in the community. There has been overwhelming response to this post, mostly positive, but most of these comments referred to a rabbi of CH by name, so they were deleted. For all named and respectful comments, please note that the author, Rabbi Daniel Green, does not have access to this blog site, so comments will be emailed to him for prior review. Hence the delay.
One last note: in response to individuals who have asked me about my own position on this matter, I posted a clarification. If your comment is directed toward me or my blog, 'WestboroRabbi' Michoel Green, please leave your comments there.