Stop Preying on Children

At the top of the food chain, humans have no known predators…. other than other humans, that is.

Since time immemorial, humans have murdered (or induced the deaths of) other humans.

Up until recently, classic predation entailed a stronger human violently preying on a weaker one. In this typical Cain-and-Abel scenario, the victor killed his victim.

Similarly, mightier armies vanquished weaker ones, and stronger populations slaughtered weaker populations.

The more powerful or populous party reserved the might-makes-right privilege of preying on the more vulnerable one.

And so it went… for millennia.

A major paradigm shift occurred in the past century.

After generations of bloody world wars and revolutions, it suddenly fell out of vogue for humans to kill other humans in the traditional manner. With notable exception to street violence in inner cities, wars by proxy and hostilities between or within smaller third-world states (not to mention a few spats over crude oil or territory where little blood was spilled), much of the world “evolved” from the recurrent killing sprees that characterized much of human history.

Instead, a new concept in human predation emerged.

In the post-modern era, “public health policy” introduced a novel idea. “Herd immunity” became an absolute value, a holy grail of sorts. The biggest obstacle to herd immunity was alleged “asymptomatic transmission.” Ostensibly healthy individuals were now considered a risk to “public health,” and the only option was a vaccine to ensure community immunity.

This all-important goal must be achieved at all costs. Everyone is expected to yield to this paramount endeavor and submit to vaccination…. for the sake of the herd.

What is vaccination? We hear very little of what’s in vaccinates, or how they work. We’ve been told that they are “safe and effective,” even when scientific studies and the accompanying inserts lists pages and pages of permanent and debilitating side effects.

Even though hundreds and then thousands of children died or suffered permanent injury, those who spoke out have been silenced. Those families supposedly “took one for the team” and made a sacrifice for the sake of the herd.

In 1986, after years of aggrieved families suing pharmaceutical companies, the government took away the right to sue the vaccine makers, the doctors

or anyone else who was involved in administering vaccines. Known as the National Child Vaccine Injury Act, it was an unprecedented removal of liability from a private company. Now, NO ONE can sue a drug manufacturer for injuries or death sustained from a vaccine.

The Supreme Court acknowledged that vaccination was inherently unsafe, but alleged that it was “unavoidably” unsafe. In other words, herd immunity has been deemed more vital than an individual's health and well-being.

And this is the modern-day manner in which humans prey on other humans.

The stronger party is the community of adults, the herd that insists on universal compliance. The victim is the child who is forced to receive the “unavoidably unsafe” vaccine.

While “public health policy” claims to be about protecting the vulnerable and immunocompromised who cannot vaccinate, it oddly targets vulnerable young children and babies instead!

The much-touted “public health policy” has become weaponized to the peril of our most vulnerable little ones, a statistical number of whom suffer injury, death, or other adverse effect...from each and every vaccine.

In contemporary times, the “herd” has become the predator, and the child who suffers vaccine injury is its prey.

This weak and defenseless population cannot advocate for themselves nor can they exercise informed consent. Public health ideologues have deviously adopted a bottleneck approach to force all parents into compliance at the impassible point of entry, or else they can’t send their children to school. “Vaccinate your kid or no school,” parents are told. And parents comply. And children get injured. Some children, at least.

As tyrannical as it seems, this occurs in democratic societies as well. Of course, democracy means little more than tyranny of the majority.

In the observation attributed to Benjamin Franklin:

Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. (And liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote)

In a way, not much has changed. The stronger still preys on the weaker.

It’s just much more insidious. Instead of seizing and killing children in an overt act of violence like the Babylonians, Spartans, and Romans did, contemporary public health policy has ingeniously indoctrinated parents to willingly offer their children up without a fight. Consequently, a certain number of these children will invariably die. For the sake of the herd.

In a cynical spin, public health ideologues claim a "moral high ground," that their policy aims to protect the vulnerable. Don't be fooled by this cloak-and-dagger moral relativism. The reality is quite the reverse. This policy has exploited the vulnerability of a new minority of victims who will fall prey to an ever-increasing onslaught of vaccines.

Similar to ancient times, this predator claims entitlement to kill his prey. After all, an unvaccinated child is a “public health risk” and that cannot be tolerated.

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

Here we are in 2020 and humans still prey on other humans. In rabbinical parlance, the klal (community) is preying on the prat (individual) [1].

The stronger (herd) is still forcing the weak into submission, and some of these weaker children will die or suffer lifelong injury, as prey of the “public health” predators.

Humans killing humans. Sigh.

Can't we evolve past this savagery?

Notes:

[1] In Judaic law, the individual has infinite value, and may NOT be sacrificed for the sake of the community.

Our sages taught:

If gentiles will demand one of a group of women, saying: "Yield us one of among you and we will defile her, if not we will defile you all", let all be defiled, rather than surrender to them one soul in Israel. [Mishna, Terumos 8:12]. Likewise, if gentiles will say to a group of men: "Yield us one of you and we will kill him, if not we will kill you all", let all of them be killed rather than surrender to them one soul in Israel. If, however, they single out the one, saying: "Give us that man, if not we will kill you all", if he be guilty of a capital crime, as, for example, Sheba son of Bichri [Samuel II 20:1], they may surrender him to them, but it is not commendable to advise them to do so; if he be not guilty of a capital crime, they all must submit rather than surrender them one soul in Israel.

Mishneh Torah, Yesodei Hatorah 5:5